37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Clean Release Compliance Subsystem Redesign
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-09
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, file structure) drive the requirements
|
|
- [x] Focused on operator value, governance, auditability, and release workflow outcomes
|
|
- [x] Written for product/release stakeholders, not only for implementers
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance intent
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary lifecycle flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No blocking ambiguity remains for `/speckit.plan`
|
|
- [x] Specification is ready for `/speckit.plan` and `/speckit.tasks`
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Architectural direction is intentional because the feature itself is a subsystem redesign rather than a small end-user capability.
|
|
- Trust model, lifecycle invariants, and immutable evidence were kept at the requirement level because they are the product value of this redesign.
|