Files
ss-tools/.specify/templates/plan-template.md
2026-03-16 23:11:19 +03:00

4.9 KiB

Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]

Branch: [###-feature-name] | Date: [DATE] | Spec: [link] Input: Feature specification from /specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md

Note: This template is filled in by the /speckit.plan command. See .specify/templates/plan-template.md for the execution workflow.

Summary

[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]

Technical Context

Language/Version: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Primary Dependencies: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Storage: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
Testing: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Target Platform: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION] Project Type: [e.g., library/cli/web-service/mobile-app/compiler/desktop-app or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Performance Goals: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Constraints: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Scale/Scope: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]

Constitution Check

GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.

[Evaluate against constitution.md and semantics.md. Explicitly confirm semantic protocol compliance, complexity-driven contract coverage, UX-state compatibility, async boundaries, API-wrapper rules, RBAC/security constraints, and any required belief-state/logging constraints for Complexity 4/5 Python modules.]

Project Structure

Documentation (this feature)

specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md              # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md          # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)

Source Code (repository root)

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/

tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│   ├── models/
│   ├── services/
│   └── api/
└── tests/

frontend/
├── src/
│   ├── components/
│   ├── pages/
│   └── services/
└── tests/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]

ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]

Structure Decision: [Document the selected structure and reference the real directories captured above]

Semantic Contract Guidance

Use this section to drive Phase 1 artifacts, especially contracts/modules.md.

  • Classify each planned module/component with @COMPLEXITY: 1..5 or @C:.
  • Use @TIER only if backward compatibility is needed; never use it as the primary contract rule.
  • Match contract density to complexity:
    • Complexity 1: anchors only, @PURPOSE optional
    • Complexity 2: @PURPOSE
    • Complexity 3: @PURPOSE, @RELATION; UI also @UX_STATE
    • Complexity 4: @PURPOSE, @RELATION, @PRE, @POST, @SIDE_EFFECT; Python also meaningful logger.reason() / logger.reflect() path
    • Complexity 5: level 4 + @DATA_CONTRACT, @INVARIANT; Python also belief_scope; UI also @UX_FEEDBACK, @UX_RECOVERY, @UX_REACTIVITY
  • Write relations only in canonical form: @RELATION: [PREDICATE] ->[TARGET_ID]
  • If any relation target, DTO, or contract dependency is unknown, emit [NEED_CONTEXT: target] instead of inventing placeholders.
  • Preserve medium-appropriate anchor/comment syntax for Python, Svelte markup, and Svelte script contexts.

Complexity Tracking

Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified

Violation Why Needed Simpler Alternative Rejected Because
[e.g., 4th project] [current need] [why 3 projects insufficient]
[e.g., Repository pattern] [specific problem] [why direct DB access insufficient]