Files
ss-tools/.specify/templates/plan-template.md
2026-05-08 18:01:49 +03:00

104 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown

# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` for the execution workflow.
## Summary
[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
## Technical Context
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
the iteration process.
-->
**Language/Version**: Python 3.13+ (backend), JavaScript/TypeScript (frontend Svelte 5)
**Primary Dependencies**: FastAPI, SQLAlchemy, APScheduler (backend); SvelteKit, Vite, Tailwind CSS (frontend)
**Storage**: PostgreSQL 16
**Testing**: pytest (backend), vitest + @testing-library/svelte (frontend)
**Target Platform**: Linux server (Docker), modern browsers
**Project Type**: web application (FastAPI REST + WebSocket backend, SvelteKit SPA frontend)
**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95 API latency, 60fps UI]
**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <100MB memory per container, RBAC enforcement, offline-capable Docker bundle]
**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 50 concurrent users, 1000 dashboards, 10 plugins]
## Constitution Check
*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
[Evaluate against constitution.md and semantics.md. Explicitly confirm semantic protocol compliance, complexity-driven contract coverage, UX-state compatibility (Svelte 5 runes), async boundaries (FastAPI), API-wrapper rules, RBAC/security constraints (local auth + ADFS SSO), plugin lifecycle rules, and any required belief-state/logging constraints for Complexity 4/5 Python modules.]
## Project Structure
### Documentation (this feature)
```text
specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
```
### Source Code (repository root)
```text
# Web application (default for this repository)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── api/ # FastAPI routes
│ ├── core/ # Core services (task_manager, auth, migration, plugins)
│ ├── models/ # SQLAlchemy ORM models
│ ├── services/ # Business logic
│ └── schemas/ # Pydantic schemas
└── tests/ # pytest tests
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── routes/ # SvelteKit pages
│ ├── lib/
│ │ ├── components/ # Reusable Svelte 5 components
│ │ ├── stores/ # Svelte rune stores ($state, $derived)
│ │ └── api/ # API client modules
│ └── i18n/ # Internationalization
└── tests/ # vitest tests
docker/ # Docker configurations
```
**Structure Decision**: This is a web application with separate `backend/` (Python/FastAPI) and `frontend/` (SvelteKit) directories. Docker Compose orchestrates both services plus PostgreSQL.
## Semantic Contract Guidance
> Use this section to drive Phase 1 artifacts, especially `contracts/modules.md`.
- Classify each planned module/component with `@COMPLEXITY: 1..5`.
- Use comment-anchor syntax appropriate for each context:
- Python: `# [DEF:id:Type]`
- Svelte markup: `<!-- [DEF:id:Type] -->`
- Svelte script: `// [DEF:id:Type]`
- Match contract density to complexity:
- Complexity 1: anchors only (DTOs, simple constants)
- Complexity 2: `@PURPOSE` (utility functions, pure helpers)
- Complexity 3: `@PURPOSE`, `@RELATION`; Svelte components also `@UX_STATE`
- Complexity 4: `@PURPOSE`, `@RELATION`, `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@SIDE_EFFECT`; Python also `belief_scope`/`reason`/`reflect` markers; Svelte also `@UX_FEEDBACK`, `@UX_RECOVERY`, `@UX_REACTIVITY`
- Complexity 5: level 4 + `@DATA_CONTRACT`, `@INVARIANT` + `@RATIONALE`/`@REJECTED` decision memory
- Write relations only in canonical form: `@RELATION PREDICATE -> TARGET_ID`
- If any relation target, DTO, or contract dependency is unknown, emit `[NEED_CONTEXT: target]` instead of inventing placeholders.
## Complexity Tracking
> **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified**
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
| [e.g., 4th plugin] | [current need] | [why 3 plugins insufficient] |
| [e.g., Service layer pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct ORM access insufficient] |