6.5 KiB
description, handoffs
| description | handoffs | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute the Rust MCP implementation planning workflow and generate research, design, contracts, and quickstart artifacts. |
|
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Outline
-
Setup: Run
.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --jsonfrom repo root and parseFEATURE_SPEC,IMPL_PLAN,SPECS_DIR, andBRANCH.IMPL_PLANis the authoritative path forplan.mdinsidespecs/<feature>/.- Derive
FEATURE_DIRfromIMPL_PLANand write every planning artifact there. - Never treat
.kilo/plans/*as workflow output for/speckit.plan.
-
Load canonical planning context:
README.mdCargo.tomldocs/SEMANTIC_PROTOCOL_COMPLIANCE.mddocs/adr/ADR-0001-semantic-rust-module-layout.mddocs/adr/ADR-0002-belief-state-runtime.mddocs/adr/ADR-0003-comment-anchored-semantic-protocol.mddocs/adr/ADR-0004-task-shaped-server-routing.md.specify/memory/constitution.md.kilo/skills/semantics-core/SKILL.md.kilo/skills/semantics-contracts/SKILL.md.kilo/skills/semantics-testing/SKILL.md.specify/templates/plan-template.md
-
Execute the planning workflow using the template structure:
- Fill
Technical Contextfor the current repository reality: Rust crate, task-shaped MCP server, semantic contracts, belief runtime, and repository-local verification. - Fill
Constitution Checkusing the local constitution, semantic protocol compliance doc, and ADR set. - ERROR if a blocking constitutional or semantic conflict is discovered and cannot be justified.
- Phase 0: generate
research.mdinFEATURE_DIR, resolving all material unknowns. - Phase 1: generate
data-model.md,contracts/modules.md, optional machine-readable contract artifacts, andquickstart.mdinFEATURE_DIR. - Materialize blocking ADR references and planning decisions inside the plan and downstream contracts.
- Run
.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh kilocodeafter planning artifacts are written.
- Fill
-
Stop and report after planning artifacts are complete. Report branch,
plan.mdpath, generated artifacts, and blocking ADR/decision-memory outcomes.
Phase 0: Research
Research must resolve only implementation-shaping unknowns that matter for this Rust MCP repository, such as:
- crate/module placement under
src/ tests/*.rsstrategy and required fixture coverage- MCP tool/resource schema design
- runtime evidence and belief-state coverage
- semantic validation boundaries and static verification workflow
- task-shaped routing, workspace safety, and error-envelope design
Write research.md with concise sections:
- Decision
- Rationale
- Alternatives Considered
- Impact On Contracts / Tasks
Use [NEED_CONTEXT: target] instead of inventing relation targets, DTO names, or module boundaries that cannot be grounded in repo context.
Phase 1: Design, ADR Continuity, and Contracts
UX / Interaction Validation
Validate the proposed design against ux_reference.md as an interaction reference for MCP callers, CLI/operator flows, result envelopes, warnings, and recovery guidance.
If the planned architecture degrades the promised interaction model, deterministic recovery path, or context-budget behavior, stop and warn the user.
Data Model Output
Generate data-model.md for Rust/MCP domain entities such as:
- tool request/response structs
- semantic query payloads
- runtime evidence envelopes
- workspace/checkpoint/index/security entities
- contract and relation traceability data
Global ADR Continuity
Before task decomposition, planning must identify any repo-shaping decisions this feature depends on or extends:
- Rust module layout and decomposition
- task-shaped tool/resource routing
- belief-state runtime behavior
- semantic comment-anchor rules
- payload/schema stability decisions
For each durable choice, ensure the plan references the relevant ADR and explicitly records accepted and rejected paths.
Contract Design Output
Generate contracts/modules.md as the primary design contract for implementation. Contracts must:
- use short semantic IDs
- classify each planned module/component with
@COMPLEXITY1-5 - use canonical relation syntax
@RELATION PREDICATE -> TARGET_ID - preserve accepted-path and rejected-path memory via
@RATIONALEand@REJECTEDwhere needed - describe MCP tools/resources, runtime evidence, validation envelopes, and semantic boundaries instead of inventing backend/frontend layers
Complexity guidance for this repository:
- Complexity 1: anchors only
- Complexity 2:
@PURPOSE - Complexity 3:
@PURPOSE,@RELATION - Complexity 4:
@PURPOSE,@RELATION,@PRE,@POST,@SIDE_EFFECT; Rust orchestration paths should account for belief runtime markers before mutation or return - Complexity 5: level 4 plus
@DATA_CONTRACT,@INVARIANT, and explicit decision-memory continuity
If a planned contract depends on unknown schema, relation target, or ADR identity, emit [NEED_CONTEXT: target] instead of fabricating placeholders.
Optional Machine-Readable Contracts
You MAY generate machine-readable artifacts in contracts/ only when they mirror the actual MCP tool/resource payloads of this Rust server. Do not default to REST/OpenAPI or frontend-sync artifacts unless the feature truly introduces them.
Quickstart Output
Generate quickstart.md using real repository verification paths, typically:
- start or exercise the MCP server entrypoint
- invoke relevant MCP tools/resources
- validate expected envelopes and recovery flows
- run
cargo test --all-targets --all-features -- --nocapture - run
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warningswhen applicable - run
python3 scripts/static_verify.py
Key Rules
- Use absolute paths in workflow execution.
- Planning must reflect the current repository structure (
src/**/*.rs,tests/*.rs,docs/adr/*) rather than legacy Python/Svelte examples. - Do not reference
.ai/*or.kilocode/*paths. - Do not write any feature planning artifact outside
specs/<feature>/.... - Do not hand off to
speckit.tasksuntil blocking ADR continuity and rejected-path guardrails are explicit.